
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
 
<title>Brighter Green</title>
<link>http://www.brightergreen.org/</link>
<description>Brighter Green</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:25:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<copyright>Copyright 2006 brightergreen.org</copyright>


<item>
<title><![CDATA[
Skillful Means: A New Report from Brighter Green
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/breeding_sow.jpg" alt="Breeding Sow" height="150" width="200" />
<p>Breeding Sow in a Medium-Sized Farm, Eastern China (Picture: Peter Li/HSI/CIWF)</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
New York&#8211;based policy action tank Brighter Green&#8217;s new report, <a href="www.brightergreen.org/files/brightergreen_china_print.pdf">Skillful Means: The Challenges of China&#8217;s Encounter with Factory Farming </a> (PDF) explores the emerging superpower&#8217;s &#8220;livestock revolution,&#8221; which is having serious impacts on public health, food security, and equity in China&mdash;and the world. The Beijing Summer Olympics are showcasing a resurgent nation, which only two generations after a devastating national famine is eating increasingly high on the food chain. In the past ten years, consumption of China&#8217;s most popular meat, pork, has doubled. In 2007, China raised well over half a billion pigs for meat. <br />
<br />
Given that every fifth person in the world is Chinese, even small increases in individual meat or dairy consumption will have broad, collective environmental as well as climate impacts. Increasingly, what the Chinese eat, and how China produces its food, affects not only China, but the world, too. <br />
<!--readmore--><br />
&#8220;When I was a child, every person was allotted one pound of pork a month,&#8221; says Peter Li, a professor of political science at the University of Houston in Texas who grew up in Jiangxi province in southeast China says in Eating Skillfully. &#8220;We could not eat more than that. You could not get it. Now, though, more people have access to more meat and want to eat a lot of it.&#8221;<br />
<br />
In yuan terms, meat is the second largest segment of China&#8217;s retail food market. China has also opened its doors to investments by major multinational meat and dairy producers, as well as animal feed corporations, including Tyson Foods, Smithfield, and Novus International. Western-style meat culture has gone mainstream. Fast food is a U.S. &#036;28-billion-a-year business in China. McDonald&#8217;s, a major sponsor of the Olympics, had more than 800 restaurants in China, with at least a hundred more set to open by the time the games began. Four McDonald&#8217;s are operating in Olympic venues, including the press center and the athletes&#8217; village. <br />
<br />
&#8220;China is not yet a bone fida &#8220;factory farm nation&#8221; like the U.S.,&#8221; says Mia MacDonald, Brighter Green&#8217;s executive director and co-author of Skillful Means. &#8220;But the strains of its fast-growing livestock sector are becoming harder to ignore. In the U.S., a re-examination of the multiple human, environmental, economic, and ethical costs of factory farming is taking place. Such a process needs to get underway in China&#8212;before it&#8217;s too late.&#8221;  <br />
<br />
Although these realities won&#8217;t be fully obvious to the millions of people cheering on the Olympic athletes in China and across the globe, they demand attention:<ul><li>China&#8217;s livestock produce 2.7 billion tons of manure every year, nearly three and a half times the industrial solid waste level. Run-off from livestock operations have created a large &#8220;dead zone&#8221; in the South China Sea that is virtually devoid of marine life.</li><li>In northern China, overgrazing and overfarming lead to the loss of nearly a million acres of grassland each year to desert.</li><li>Diet-related chronic diseases now kill more Chinese than any other cause, and nearly one in four Chinese is overweight.</li><li>More than 90 percent of some bacteria in Asia can no longer be treated effectively with &#8220;first-line&#8221; antibiotics like penicillin&#8212;due to their overuse in farmed animals.</li><li>China can still feed itself. But this is likely to change as its meat and dairy sectors expand and intensify. The Chinese government is looking abroad, not only to international food markets but also to Africa, Latin America, and other parts of Asia for land on which to produce food for people and feed for livestock.</li><li>In 2008, China surpassed the U.S. to become the world&#8217;s leading emitter of carbon dioxide (CO2). Per capita emissions of CO2 in China have more than doubled, from 2.1 tons of CO2 equivalent in 1990 to 5.1 tons today. Meat and dairy production have a direct relationship with global climate change: fully 18 percent of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions stem from the livestock industry.</li></ul><br />
Even though the Chinese government seems set on emulating industrialized nations&#8217; meat and dairy culture, a small but growing number of Chinese non-governmental organizations and individuals are questioning this path. To them food quality, not quantity, is important, along with issues of sustainability and animal welfare.<br />
<br />
Eating Skillfully recommends the following actions to both the Chinese government and civil society:<ul><li>The government ought to redefine its conception of short- and long-term food security so it doesn&#8217;t give priority to a meat-centered diet. Meat in China ought to be, as it was, a condiment and not the mainstay of a meal.</li><li>Government subsidies that now support the expansion of industrial-scale livestock operations, owned by Chinese or foreign companies, should be ended.</li><li>The &#8220;externalities&#8221; on which animal agriculture is dependent&#8212;such as riverine and marine water pollution, contamination of soil and groundwater, and land degradation&#8212;should be paid for, in full, by the industry and/or specific facilities that cause them.</li><li>Increased sharing of information and experiences of industrial animal agriculture should take place among policy-makers, academics, and civil society groups in China and other countries, both developing and developed.</li><li>A forum for dialogue between the government and China&#8217;s and global animal welfare, environment and other civil society organizations should be established.</li><li>The growing environmental movement in China ought to include the issue of intensive animal agriculture within its analysis, awareness-raising, and advocacy activities, and collaborate with civil society groups working on related issues.</li></ul> <br />
Contact: Mia MacDonald, Brighter Green, New York, E-mail: macdonald@brightergreen.org (After August 26: Tel: (1) 917 202 2809). <br />
<br />
Peter Li, University of Houston, Texas <br />
Tel: (1) 832-647-6518. E-mail: LiP@uhd.edu
]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:11:32 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=51
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=51
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
Food for Thought
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/kangaroo_meat.jpg" alt="Kangaroo meat" height="128" width="89" />
<p>Kangaroo: How rare do you want it?</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
File this under "Suggestive Connection": In <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7551125.stm">a report on the BBC</a>, an Australian researcher is recommending a vast increase in the farming and eating of kangaroos in order to combat global warming. Because of their different digestive systems, kangaroos do not produce as much methane as cows and sheep (currently the main source of meat for Australians), and thus humans switching to a different sort of muscle to chew on would reduce Australia's greenhouse gas emissions.<br />
<br />
In an <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7555206.stm"> unrelated&mdash;but perhaps not <em>that</em> unrelated&mdash;story</a>, a team of scientists have discovered that many prehistoric species extinctions, including that of the three-meter tall giant kangaroo and marsupial lion, were caused not by natural causes, such as catastrophic weather events or habitat change, but by the newly evolved human beings. Apparently, we hunted them to death -- presumably, as many animals continue to be today, for our consumption.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:24:45 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=50
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=50
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
Primates: Good News and Bad
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/imagesyounggorilla.jpg" alt="Young lowland gorilla" height="133" width="88" />
<p>Ah, youth - and a place to live</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
A drought of blogs here, due to a range of other Brighter Green projects, but rain (of a sort) has returned. In fact, it has been a very rainy summer in New York, but sunny, too. A paradox, like the subject of this blog. An exhaustive foot and air survey has led scientists from the New York-based <a href="http://www.wcs.org">Wildlife Conservation Society</a> to conclude that nearly <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/05/science/05apes.html?scp=1&sq=lowland%20gorilla&st=cse">125,000 western lowland gorillas</a> are alive, and doing pretty well, in the forests of the Congo Republic. That's about the human population of Flint, Michigan or odiferous Elizabeth, New Jersey. So used to hearing about non-human primates in small numbers, this news struck me (and many others) as extraordinary. But with the sweet comes the bitter. Forests nearly everywhere in the global south are under threat (more below) from loggers, poachers, farmers, and others. Can the gorillas' idyll last? Watch a few minutes of video of some of them <a href="http://www.wcs.org/gorilladiscovery/wcs_gorilladiscovery">here</a>.  <br />
<br />
Now for the bad news: another study, also recently released, says that <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7541192.stm">primates are under threat of extinction</a> as no other members of a species are. In Asia, 70% of primates are endangered. What primates around the world face: loss of habitat and loss of lives, including hunting for meat -- including in places where habitat is relatively intact. "In many places, primates are quite literally being eaten to extinction," Russell Mittermeier, chair of the <a href="http://cms.iucn.org">IUCN</a> primate specialist group says. A dismaying, although apt, segue to the last bit of (bad) news: the world's forests may fall faster and further as a result of human primates' escalating demands for food, fuel, and wood. The <a href="http://www.rightsandresources.org/publication_details.php?publicationID=737">Rights and Resources Initiative</a> reports that only half of the land needed by 2030 to meet these demands is available, without encroaching on tropical forests. "Arguably, we are on the verge of the last great global land grab," RRI's Andy White, co-author of the report, told the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7503304.stm">BBC</a>. <br />
<br />
Watch this space for more blogs and news soon, and Brighter Green's about-to-be-released case study -- in time for the Beijing Olympics -- on China and intensifying meat production and consumption (yeah, this is a mouthful in need of a rebranding. People at work on it.)
]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:16:29 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=49
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=49
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
(Inter)National Interest
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/gorilladeadincongo.jpg" alt="Mountain gorillas dead" height="102" width="136" />
<p>Mourning in Congo</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
I know that for most readers, the words "National Geographic" don't conjure anything very exciting. Interesting, sure. Many of us grew up amid stacks of the yellow-bordered periodical in our living rooms or stored carefully in our basements, thumbing through the pages to learn about Pharaohs or Incan gold or Hawaii's big waves and to ogle the often-stellar photos (with or without our parents hovering). But <em>exciting</em>? Not so much. About a year ago, after decades of not reading NG, I decided to get a subscription. Now, I wouldn't say reading it is as scintillating as being at a rave or atop a big wave on a surfboard may be (neither of which I've experienced), but it is almost always really interesting. <br />
<br />
And less, how can I say it, hoary than I remember? (OK, I am just a bit older now.) Today's NG delves much further into socio-economic realities, equity, poverty, sustainability, and other essential issues than I ever recall it doing before. As if it realized that we, the junior high schoolers, could take--indeed, needed--more reality, semi-unvarnished (the photos are still incredibly glossy).<br />
<br />
 I'd highly recommend checking out two recent editions: the first is a <a href="http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/05/china/journey/hessler-text">whole issue devoted to China</a>. Lots on the environment and the toll of industrialization, China's building and consumption booms, and the diversity of China's peoples. Just one nugget: 37% of people driving cars in China today didn't know how to drive three years ago...and 1,000 new cars a day take to the road in Beijing. <br />
<br />
The other is the <a href="http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/07/table-of-contents">current issue</a>, with the very 21st century title, "Who Murdered the Mountain Gorillas" emblazoned over a portrait of a silverback in Congo. Note that NG uses "murdered," implying personhood, rather than the more generic term "killed," much more usually used when referring to non-human animals. The article on the seven mountain gorillas slaughtered in 2007 reads like a political and ecological thriller, but with substance. It delves into the complex factors that put gorillas at risk in Congo's <a href="http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/63">Virunga National Park</a> and the complex factions in whose hands their lives rest (from charcoal traders to a warlord who professes to be a conservationist to noble rangers--and at least one park ranger suspected of being extremely unnoble). The photos are stunning, and also harrowing. <br />
<br />
If you read the article and want to know more about the gorillas and the rangers' daily--blogged--efforts to protect them, here's a link to <a href="http://gorilla.wildlifedirect.org">Wildlife Direct's gorilla protection page</a>. You can also support the rangers' work. Now, I don't store the new old NG's in a basement anymore, but before I pass them along, I do tend to find myself reading them (almost) yellow-bordered cover to cover.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:13:18 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=48
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=48
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
Something's, Well, Fishy
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/imageshumpback.jpg" alt="Humpback" height="84" width="150" />
<p>Perhaps the one I didn't see</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
Sometimes people say the strangest things...the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7476652.stm">International Whaling Commission meeting yesterday rejected Greenland's request to hunt 10 humpback whales</a>. The IWC judged the hunt not essential for Greenland's indigenous population and too commercial to qualify as subsistence whaling. At least 25% of the meat ends up in supermarkets, according to a <a href="http://www.wspa-usa.org/download/112_wspa_defyinginternational.pdf">recent report by the World Society for the Protection of Animals</a>. Denmark, of which Greenland is an autonomous territory, dissented, as did Japan, South Korea and perhaps surprisingly, the U.S. But amid the angry words, one response left me, well, without words. It was this, from Daven Joseph of the St Kitts and Nevis delegation: "At a time when the world is witnessing food shortages, we are seeing a small group of countries that are purporting to be world leaders depriving marginal peoples of the right to eat." <br />
<br />
As if...an infusion of whaling and whale meat could solve the global food crisis (which is nothing to joke about). Why not an infusion to Greenland of tofu, lentils or even Boca burgers? I was lucky enough to visit Greenland several years ago. It's a remarkable place: beautiful, austere, enveloping. The population is about 26,000 and compared to Denmark, Greenland is quite poor. But its people are not facing a food crisis. There are supermarkets. And subsistence hunting of seals and yes, whales: minkes. Speaking of whales, when I was there, my colleagues and I went on a boat trip with Greenlanders. Two boats. Mine saw a seal -- not unexciting. But the other group saw a humpback and came back ecstatic. Ever since I've regretted not being on that boat.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:35:50 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=47
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=47
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
Rustling in the Rainforest
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/imagescattlerustle.jpg" alt="Cattle rainforest" height="89" width="136" />
<p>They're out of the forest...now</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
Earlier this week, the Brazilian government <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/25/business/worldbusiness/25beef.html?ex=1215144000&en=e8074915c45916f4&ei=5070&emc=eta1"">captured and removed 3,100 cows grazing in a nature reserve in the Amazon</a>. The "raid", if it can be called that, was designed as a warning to other ranchers grazing their cattle on what was once rainforest but has been illegally deforested. Perhaps 60,000 cattle have this "status" in the Amazon (outlaw, from now on), although the number could be higher since, according to a <a href="http://www.amazonia.org.br/arquivos/259673.pdf">recent report from Friends of the Earth-Brazilian Amazon</a>, nearly 75 million cattle are in the Amazon. Environmentalists in Brazil praised the government's action, but warned that if it was a one-time thing, a stunt of sorts, it wouldn't dissuade cattle operators lured into the rainforest by cheap land, often found (illegally) in indigenous reserves or protected areas. <br />
<br />
Some such cattle are, reportedly, being moved out to avoid any future government seizure plans (another 10,000 cattle are slated for removal). As to the fate of the Amazon rainforest over the longer-tern: it's uncertain. Rates of clearing aren't as high as they were at their peak in 2004, but have been accelerating in recent months, stirring unease within the government and alarm elsewhere. The fate of the legally "rustled" cattle? Well, more certain. They'll be auctioned, with proceeds going to a government nutrition program for poor Brazilians, health care for indigenous groups and to fund future cattle-out-of-illegally-deforested-Amazon-removal efforts.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:11:45 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=46
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=46
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
World Environment Day
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/imagesworldenviroday.jpg" alt="Green Earth" height="121" width="109" />
<p>Let's celebrate</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
Yes, it's the annual celebration of <a href="http://www.unep.org/wed/2008/english">World Environment Day</a>. Even though the occasion usually draws a yawn, if that, in most of the U.S. and Europe, it is celebrated enthusiastically in other parts of the world. "Kick the Carbon Habit" is this year's World Environment Day theme. Celebrants are urged to find ways to reduce their own personal carbon emissions, and support progress toward low carbon economies. Click <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world/international-day.html">here</a> to read about how World Environment Day is being marked in a number of countries and regions, including those set to be most affected by (and least ready to adapt to) climate change. <br />
<br />
Quick World Environment Day update: after reaching its goals of first, one, and then two <em>billion</em> trees planted around the world...the <strong>Billion Tree Campaign</strong> has set a new goal: <em>seven billion</em> by 2009. Read more, see who's pledged and register your tree planting efforts <a href="http://www.unep.org/BILLIONTREECAMPAIGN">here</a>.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:02:30 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=45
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=45
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
Food Matters...Again
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/imageskeyhole.jpg" alt="Key hole garden" height="85" width="111" />
<p>Key to a food secure future? View from Lesotho</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
In Rome, the <a href="http://www.fao.org">UN Food and Agriculture Organization</a> has convened a summit to deal with the world's growing food crisis, which threatens -- through high prices and flagging production -- to push another 100 million people into the category of hungry; 800 million are already there. The Summit, whose attendees include some heads of state and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, concludes on Thursday. Look out for the final declaration and action plan. In the meantime, get an <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/7432583.stm">update on what's been happening from the BBC.</a> The BBC has some excellent reporting on food issues this week. Two stories caught my eye. The first is on corn and tortilla prices in Mexico. Read it <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7432164.stm">here</a>. According to the report one reason why Mexico can't increase agricultural production substantially is because so many rural Mexicans, once farmers, have made their way north to work in U.S. cities. <br />
<br />
The second BBC story comes from the southern African nation of Lesotho, where over-use of soil and clearing of trees and other vegetation has left much farmland teetering at the edge of infertility or already there. <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7432972.stm"> The BBC story</a> focuses on a family that's found a home-grown remedy: "key hole gardens." The gardens are producing enough vegetables to feed large extended families, with some left over for local markets. A mini (deep) green revolution. From China comes an example of another kind of revolution, which some call "pink." Today, according to a recent issue of <a href="http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm">National Geographic</a> on China, the country has precisely <em>one</em> McDonald's drive-through. By the end of this year however, there will be -- wait for it -- <em>115</em>. "Food is life," Deputy Minister for Agriculture and Food Security, Efraim Lehatahe, told the BBC, commenting on his country's predicament and the Rome food summit's agenda. "If we can't afford that, we're finished."
]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 08:51:17 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=44
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=44
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
Billion Bag Ban
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/imageschinabags.jpg" alt="China plastic bags" height="94" width="128" />
<p>Soon to be in the dustbin of history?</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
On June 1st, China imposed a national ban on ultra-thin plastic bags, the kind we all get -- or have -- at supermarkets, drug stores and even, sometimes, at fruit or vegetable stands. From yesterday, shoppers in China will have to bring their own bag or, if they want a plastic bag, slightly thicker varieties will be available, for a fee. Men Xiaowei from China's Ministry of Commerce said in <a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2008-06/01/content_6726830.htm">an on-line interview with China Daily</a> that the plastic bag ban was "a 'habit revolution'. To limit the use of plastic bags is to protect our environment." According to China Daily, an astonishing 1,300 tons of oil had been used in China every day to produce plastic shopping bags just for supermarkets. (I wonder if Wal-Mart, an increasing large player in China's retail landscape, is included in that total. Probably not.) Another eye-popping number: China used three billion plastic bags a day, more than two per person. A <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/01/business/plastic.php">Reuters report on Sunday indicated some hiccups with the ban</a>, although nothing very surprising: one shopper thought the ban was coming into effect in a month or so, while a steamed bun seller was still using the thin plastic bags in violation of the new law. He said he'd continue until his supply was exhausted...and then begin charging customers about 3 cents for a thicker plastic bag -- if they don't change their habits and bring their own.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:21:22 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=43
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=43
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
Good Grazing
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/imagesgrazing.jpg" alt="Land on Earth from space" height="118" width="118" />
<p>Planetary grazing</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
Last night I watched a Web video of a talk New York Times food writer <a href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/speakers/view/id/234">Mark Bittman</a> gave at a TED conference last December called <a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/263">"What's Wrong With What We Eat."</a> Bittman, a wry and clear writer is, it turns out, a wry and clear speaker. His main thesis: over-consumption of meat is putting the planet and us at risk, big-time (his emphasis), due to its links with global warming and human disease. In crafting his argument over 20 minutes, Bittman makes some of the same points and employs some of the same data that we at Brighter Green have been using...but he has a much, much snappier Power Point. It's worth watching and then, as I did, this morning, sending the link to friends and colleagues. Better yet: let people know about this blog. And for those unfamiliar with Bittman's writing on these issues, it's worth digesting his <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/weekinreview/27bittman.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=meat+guzzler&st=nyt&oref=slogin">New York Times' article, "Rethinking the Meat Guzzler"</a> from earlier this year. The piece got quite a reception: it was the most-emailed article on the Times' Website for days and then nested among the Times' top 10 most emailed for weeks. Bittman's latest book is <a href="http://www.howtocookeverything.tv/htce/Home/index.html">"How to Cook Everything Vegetarian."</a> It's chunky and green.  <br />
<!--readmore--><br />
Another excellent piece of writing I came across today (no video version yet) is an <a href="http://www.fresnobee.com/644/story/586406.html">oped by PCRM's Hope Ferdowsian in the Fresno (Calif.) Bee, "Fighting the Food Crisis One Bite at a Time."</a> She examines, through data and personal experience, how what's on our plates -- and particularly animal foods -- determines what food is and isn't available for people in the developing world (global South). With rising food prices still in the headlines, this is essential reading.<br />
<br />
Finally, I had the opportunity to hear <a href="http://www.heathermills.org">Heather Mills</a> (until recently also McCartney) speak over the weekend (on Saturday night she hosted a gala in Manhattan for <a href="http://www.farmsanctuary.org">Farm Sanctuary</a>; Sunday she attended a book party as a special guest. I attended as one of the hoi polloi). On Sunday, she told this story of how she'd returned to veganism from a stint as a vegetarian. During the Live 8 charity concert in 2005 (that would be when she was still married to Paul), she was standing back stage with an African woman, an NGO leader. Mills said she asked her, "How does it feel to have all these thousands of people here who've shown up because they care about you and your continent?" The woman replied, to Mills' amazement: "That's great, but it would help even more if people didn't drink so many lattes." The woman explained that in her country, close to villages where children went hungry at night, were huge fields of grain that were harvested and shipped to Europe to feed to dairy cows. Privation amid plenty. We are all bound together, far more than we may think on an average day. Needless to say, Mills said, that was the last day she drank a morning cow's milk latte.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:55:10 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=42
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=42
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
Rosy City
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/imageslilac.jpg" alt="lilacs" height="106" width="141" />
<p>Fragrant City</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
I've been spending a few days in Portland, Oregon, also known as the City of Roses. The roses aren't in bloom yet, but the lilacs are. Large bushes or trees of them seem to be everywhere here, in hues from light lavender to bright, deep purple. I came out to the northwest to give two talks, first at <a href="http://www.pdx.edu">Portland State University</a> and then at Portland's annual <a href="http://portlandvegfest.org/2008">VegFest</a>. My topic? The environmental, climate, public health, equity and food security issues surrounding industrial meat production, in the U.S. and in the fast-growing countries of the developing world. I've enjoyed interacting with activists, environmentalists, students, philosophers, vegans and omnivores. They listened to and read (I think) my projected slides and then voiced some terrific ideas, observations and questions. The title of my second talk was "Your Burger or Your Car." Ironically, across from the VegFest venue was a Hummer dealership. But I haven't seen a single Hummer seen on Portland's streets, however.<!--readmore-->  <br />
<br />
When I haven't been speaking, I've been walking, visiting with friends and eating. (I also made a quick trip to Mt. Hood where it was snowing and people were skiiing. Quite a sight for an east coaster in May.) Portland has an increasingly lively set of vegetarian eateries. I enjoyed <a href="http://www.vegetarianhouse.com">Vegetarian House</a> in Chinatown my first night in town. My 90-year-old uncle, visiting from Seattle, also was nourished by the pungent mock meat and the subtle messages in the fortune cookies. Cafeteria-style <a href="http://www.veganopolis.com">Veganopolis</a> has been great for breakfast, lunch and free WiFi. Today I ate a "Democracy Burger." Not coincidentally, the three main contenders for the U.S. Presidency all have been in Oregon in recent days. At <a href="http://www.nutshellpdx.com">Nutshell</a>, a hip, relatively new vegan hot spot, I bit into a 150 ingredient (really) flat bread -- inventive -- excellent greens and a beet and Fuji apple salad. When I emerged into the evening (cool, but clear and light until late), I smelled the lilacs again, and tried to inhale deeply.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 09:40:21 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=41
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=41
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
World, Warming, in a Coffee Mug
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/imagesmug.jpg" alt="Mug" height="101" width="135" />
<p>The mug, ready for sale at a (too) reasonable price</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
A few months ago I got a global warming mug as a gift. It's high-concept. When you pour in a hot beverage, a world map stuck on the mug changes. Coastal regions disappear (so long, Bangladesh and south Florida). They're "flooded" by blue, mimicking what's expected to happen if, as scientists predict, sea levels rise between 11 and 17 inches over the next 92 years. Those sea level increases would be accompanied by (really, caused by) a rise in global temperature of between 1.8° and 4° C by 2100. That's 3.2° to 7.2° Fahrenheit. <br />
<br />
But wait, even if your coffee's getting cold. Global temperatures may rise even higher, faster: by as much as 6.4° C (11.5° F) by century's end. So, the mug is pretty cool (although it can't go into my Energy Star, 18-inch, water-saving dishwasher). But something about it struck me first as odd, then as almost risible. When I turned it over, I saw a familiar three words: Made in China. So much else is, that both does and doesn't cost an arm and a leg, so why not this, too? <!--readmore--> <br />
The U.S. was, until very recently, the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases. Yet, a mug, sold in the U.S., presumably to raise awareness of global warming (even if at a slightly kitsch level), is made in China. So the emissions toll of that manufacture is outsourced and added to China's total. China, very recently anointed the world's new, largest emitter of greenhouse gases, surpassed the U.S. in this dubious honor precisely because of its roaring manufacturing economy and booming consumer lifestyle. China's making and selling  everything from pricey linen clothes to cars to solar-powered battery chargers to...probably billions of coffee mugs, mine among them. <br />
<br />
So, what kept me from finishing my tea? Well, something like this: China's following our lead and becoming the world's main greenhouse gas culprit, in part because they make nearly all of the stuff we buy. Global warming's a crucial challenge. But a mug sold in the U.S. to elucidate consumers (and hot beverage drinkers) about the toll of global warming isn't made at home -- saving considerable GHGs from shipping -- it's made in China. And now <em>that</em> mug has helped, in some small way, China ratchet up its global warming impact on the world. It also may have been made by young women or men in a sweatshop...and I try to avoid products made in China precisely for this reason. Oy vey. It was all enough to make me want to drop the mug and see the map -- coastlines intact or not -- shatter, so I wouldn't be responsible anymore. <br />
<br />
Alas, the mug survives. And so does my quandary. There are many things for which to blame China (suppression in Tibet, stalling on Darfur, imprisoning journalists and rights advocates). But not for this mug. For that, I blame whoever decided to make it in a Chinese factory where labor's  cheap and labor rights scarce. Surely a global warming mug should cost in line with its cost to the Earth. Just as surely, the emissions associated with making and delivering that mug ought to have been as small as possible, meaning local, or localized, production. <br />
<br />
I haven't seen my global warming mug recently. I know it's still in the cabinet, the map a little rough around the edges now, but I'm mostly happy for it to stay there. The other day, though, I read this interesting poem, posted anonymously on a Website by a "silent, silent Chinese" and quoted in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/29/education/29student.html?scp=1&sq=China+students+U.S.&st=nyt">this recent piece in the New York Times</a>. It made me think of the conundrum of my mug...and how we're all in the climate change conundrum together. Even though my mug isn't sophisticated enough to spell it out: as the seas rise, millions of people, coastal villages and other coast-dwelling species will be engulfed. That is something to let my tea go cold over. But before your hot beverage gets really cold, here's the text of the poem, made in China, I presume:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"When we have a billion people, you said we were destroying the planet./ When we tried limiting our numbers, you said it is human rights abuse...When we were poor, you thought we were dogs./ When we loan you cash, you blame us for your debts./ When we build our industries, you called us polluters./ When we sell you goods, you blame us for global warming."</blockquote><br />
And when we make global warming mugs, you....
]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 09:51:34 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=40
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=40
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
Old King Corn
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/corn.jpg" alt="corn field" height="118" width="127" />
<p>Kingdom of corn</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
Documentary film <a href="http://www.kingcorn.net">King Corn</a> tells the story of two college friends who, in a post-graduate quest narrative, set out to understand America's food system, particularly the centrality to it of corn. They lease an acre of land in <a href="http://www.greeneiowa.com">Greene, Iowa</a> (coincidentally, home to grandparents of both of the young men) and plant, well, what else, but corn? (Their tiny acre is surrounded by thousands of acres of corn, all looking exactly the same as theirs). The acre of corn offers a way for the two guys, genial, laid-back tour guides, to investigate current U.S. farm economics and why so many of us eat the food we do. <br />
<br />
Their acre is, after the application of government subsidies, fertilizers and a combine harvester headed where most other U.S. corn ends up. That's in a feedlot, where it's used to fatten up (fast) beef cattle, who mill in their thousands, with nothing to do but eat...corn, without shade or vegetation or distraction. Or a processing plant, to be made into the high fructose corn syrup that's become endemic in supermarkets, bulking up and sweetening products in every aisle but fresh produce.<!--readmore--> <br />
<br />
The film is indebted to <a href="http://www.michaelpollan.com/omnivore.php">Michael Pollan's Omnivore's Dilemma</a>, a deconstruction of the corn economy, and Pollan appears in the film. So does recently deceased <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earl_Butz">Earl Butz</a>, U.S. Agriculture Secretary in the early 1970s. He's credited with unleashing the ocean of mega-corn in which we, and others, are engulfed. He doesn't have any regrets: we have cheap food, he tells the filmmakers, and lots of it.  <br />
<br />
King Corn tells the story of corn in the U.S. But as food prices rise  and protests about them around the world stay in the headlines, it's worth watching. What's happened in the U.S. is taking place in other countries, too. Mega-corn has gone global. And countries are having trouble feeding themselves, or paying high food prices on world markets. King Corn's protagonists have a telling scene: their corn is high and they want to taste the sweet yellow kernels. Corn on the cob in the raw, right? Nothing like it: they find the corn inedible. It's become industrial food. It's not meant for eating. It's meant for processing...ultimately, us.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:40:54 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=39
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=39
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
Musing
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/imagescostarica.jpg" alt="Rainforest" height="78" width="111" />
<p>Did cows once roam here?</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
In a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/opinion/23wed4.html?scp=1&sq=%22million+dollar+meat%22&st=nyt">recent editorial</a>, the New York Times mused on a world where <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/21/us/21meat.html?scp=3&sq=&st=nyt">meat is grown in vitro in a lab</a>. While acknowleding their "disgust" at the methods used by the modern meat industry in the U.S., the editors lamented the potential loss of farm animals. I mused on this, too, and came up with these thoughts, which I shared with the <em>Times'</em> Letters Editor:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Re "Million Dollar Meat" (April 23, 2008), you state that "it will be a barren world if the herds and flocks disappear" in favor of meat grown in a lab. But the facts suggest otherwise. The livestock sector "may well be the leading player in the reduction of biodiversity," according to a 2006 UN report. Today, 30 percent of Earth's land is used to raise animals for meat and dairy production; once this was habitat for wildlife. The livestock sector is the major cause of deforestation around the world. The cattle population in the Amazon has reached a new high and rates of clearing are rising. So, land without livestock won't be barren for long. It would be repopulated by other forms of life. Surely most non-human species, along with many of us, would find that a welcome change.</blockquote>  <br />
In Costa Rica, the bottom fell out of the beef market years ago and government policies encouraged some former ranch land (once rainforest)to be left alone. Now, in many former pastures, the forest and some species have come back. Unaided. Something to muse on, too.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:29:22 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=38
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=38
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
A Warming World....in Manhattan
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/imagesmara.jpg" alt="Savannah" height="87" width="116" />
<p>From there to here</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
Climate change means erratic weather, melting polar ice caps, rising seas and more intense hurricanes, droughts and floods. Green energy means lower greenhouse gas emissions and more trees left standing to combat desertification, reduce soil erosion, and offset CO2 in the atmosphere. Learn more about the interactions between the two, tonight, in Manhattan's Greenwich Village. Francis ole Sakuda and Daniel Salau of the <a href="http://www.simookenya.org/index.htm">Simba Maasai Outreach Organization</a> (SIMOO) in Kenya will discuss the realities of climate change for indigenous communities in Kenya and elsewhere. They'll also describe their use of solar power to bring energy and new opportunities to rural communities off the grid. Here are the details:<br />
<br />
When: <strong>Friday, April 25, 2008, 6:30 p.m.</strong><br />
Where: <strong>Judson Hall Church, Washington Square South</strong> (at West 4th Street&#8212;entrance at 239 Thompson St.)<br />
<br />
Maasai bead work will be for sale (crafted by women's groups in Kenya) and there'll be refreshments, too. Co-sponsored by <strong>Brighter Green</strong>, <a href="http://newyork.sierraclub.org/nyc">Sierra Club NYC Group</a> and <a href="http://www.tribal-link.org">Tribal Link Foundation.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:02:25 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=37
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=37
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
Just in Time...
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/climate friendly.jpg" alt="Climate friendly" height="126" width="107" />
<p>Eating as if it really mattered....</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
For Earth Day, author-activist <a href="http://www.takeabite.cc/about/anna-lappe">Anna Lappe</a> has launched a great new Website on the intersections between food and climate change, <a href="http://www.takeabite.cc">Take a Bite out of Climate Change</a>. It's chock-a-block with facts, ideas for action -- including how and what to eat -- and witty, insightful and regular blogs. (I'm happy to be on the Take a Bite <a href="http://www.takeabite.cc/about/our-team-advisors">Advisory Council</a>.) Hip high-tech, high concept Wired magazine is also bringing its perspective to eating and equity. <a href="http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/04/food-riots-begi.html">A recent Wired column</a> encourages those of us in the wealthy world to cut back or forego meat entirely as a means of making more grain available as food (not feed) to those in the global south, millions of whom are experiencing steep and devastating food price rises and hunger. <br />
<br />
And <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/home.ns">New Scientist</a> reports on a <a href="http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn13741-food-miles-dont-feed-climate-change--meat-does.html?feedId=online-news_rss20">really interesting study</a> that deconstructs the food miles argument for local eating. It doesn't debunk it -- it's valid to weigh up how far your food travelled and the resources used to transport it, especially oil. But researchers found that eating locally doesn't cut our climate impact as much as cutting meat and dairy out of our diet would. Red meat is especially climate-heavy. "The differences between eating habits are very, very striking," Carnegie Mellon University researcher Christopher Weber tells New Scientist. That's an Earth Day message we could all chew on, and digest. To help, <a href="http://www.takeabite.cc/eat/the-climate-friendly-diet">here</a> are the Take a Bite campaign's tips for a climate-friendly eating.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 06:33:12 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=36
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=36
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
New Food Lexicon: What's in a Term?
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/imagessoy.jpg" alt="soy crop" height="93" width="124" />
<p>Soyanized</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
Some new terms have been making their way into the increasingly intense debate about rising global food prices, their causes, and what on Earth to do about it. Yesterday, UNESCO released a report, four years in the making on food and agriculture, that called for the end of "status quo" farming. It's a term I hadn't heard used before, but which has a lot of resonance and relevance. It was used to describe the model of industrial agriculture that's being spread around the world: heavy on fossil fuels, light on concern for the environment, and dismissive of organic or other more natural production methods (such as crop rotation). Read an Associated Press story about the UNESCO report <a href="http://news.aol.com/story/_a/experts-at-unesco-say-status-quo-in/n20080415124209990040">here</a>. Click <a href="http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=29008&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html">here</a> for the full report. As prices of basic staples like grains rise and put their daily bread out of reach of millions of people,  industrial agriculture is getting a much-needed closer look.<!--readmore--> <br />
<br />
What's being revealed isn't pretty: increasing water deficits, "feed" for animals raised for milk or meat dominating markets for grains and fueling deforestation and desertification; and public health crises of obesity and malnutrition. The mirror is cracked, indeed. <br />
<br />
Another new word I recently heard: "soyanization." That's as in a country's agriculture becoming dominated by a monocrop, such as soy, which is produced primarily to feed farmed animals. In Argentina, soy became a major flash point between the government and farmers. Nearly three weeks of protests broke out over government plans to add raise the tax on soy exports. The protestors illuminated the downsides of the soy economy Argentina has created: low margins and high costs; deforestation (soy is also a key driver of deforestation and devegetation in Brazil); and polluted water. From this vantage point, the status quo doesn't look very good, either.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:19:12 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=35
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=35
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
Food Fever
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/imagescornfield.jpg" alt="Corn field" height="95" width="143" />
<p>Waves of grain and rage</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
Flash points over food are getting more common. In the last week or so, protests over food prices and availability have roiled Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Indonesia, Egypt and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/08/world/americas/08briefs-THOUSANDSPRO_BRF.html?scp=2&sq=Haiti+food+riots&st=nyt">now Haiti, where already several people have died</a>. Peaceful marchers rallied outside the Presidential Palace, shouting angrily and plaintively, "We're hungry." For growing numbers of the world's poor people, rising food prices are putting staples -- mostly grains -- out of reach. World food prices have been climbing for more than a year, but 2008 has seen even steeper increases (including in the U.S.) In just a year, global food prices overal have ticked upward by nearly 25%, grain prices by 42%.<br />
<br />
What's driving the increases, and the unrest? Demand for grain to produce biofuels, increasingly urban and affluent populations seeking out more meat and dairy products, most notably in China, which is driving up the price of feed grains to fatten all those animals, and record-high oil prices (industrial agriculture is heavily dependent on oil for transport and to produce chemical fertilizer). Climate change has also played its part as both drought and floods bedevil crops. <!--readmore--> The realities of rising food prices have captured the attention of a international organizations and the media; New York Times economics columnist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/07/opinion/07krugman.html?scp=2&sq=Paul+Krugman&st=nyt">Paul Krugman weighed in on Monday in a column called "Grains Gone Wild."</a> He urged greater support for the World Food Program and other agencies providing food staples to hungry people; the WFP is facing a &#036;500 million budget gap due to the skyrocketing prices. <br />
<br />
Of course, this begs some essential questions that aren't being asked as loudly as they ought to be, at least not yet. Can the industrialized world really scramble food security for millions of people in its pursuit of alternatives to oil? (And when the numbers are all crunched, biofuels don't reduce our total energy use much at all.) Will poor people's access to essential grains be choked off so ever more grain can be fed to farmed animals and then, in turn, to the world's wealthier citizens as flesh and bone?<br />
<br />
Haiti provides an object lesson of what may be ahead, if policies and practices don't change (and not very far ahead of where we are now). A friend who's living and working in Haiti writes of the current situation: "This place is in total chaos...cooking oil, rice, other staples have doubled in the last 4-5 months...lots of looting, general destruction, smashing of glass, etc....there is a real chance we may be evacuated...[the people] are desperate and hungry...."<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=aAlFqm20PhMc&refer=latin_america">"The problem is serious,"</a> the head of the <a href="http://www.fao.org">UN Food and Agriculture Organization</a> said on Tuesday, adding that the riots may well spread; people in poor countries often spend 50 to 60 percent of their income on food. Rising prices mean an even bigger bite -- and less to eat.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:55:13 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=34
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=34
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
Animals and War: Further Dispatches
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/elephanttusks.jpg" alt="elephant with tusks" height="111" width="74" />
<p>Under pressure</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
More news from the frontlines about the toll of war on other animals. <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/117875">In a recent article, Newsweek calls endangered species the "new conflict diamonds</a>." Trade in ivory and wildlife, poached mainly in Africa and shipped mostly to the U.S., China and Japan, is fueling multiple conflicts. The Janjaweed, the government-backed militia that has brought death and destruction to Sudan's Darfur region for nearly five years now, also runs a lucrative trade in elephant tusks. Hundreds (if not more) elephants in Chad have been killed, processed and exported by the Janjaweed, using their arsenal of horses and high-powered rifles. <br />
<br />
Thousands of illegal items made from contraband ivory are <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/05/22/endangered.elephants/index.html">for sale on eBay</a>, according to recent reports by wildlife monitoring group <a href="http://www.traffic.org">TRAFFIC</a> and the <a href="http://www.ifaw.org/ifaw/general/default.aspx">International Fund for Animal Welfare</a>. Not only elephants, but also highly endangered gorillas, tigers, rhinos, macaws and other large birds, and reptiles are being hunted and killed and sold -- with the proceeds (practically untraceable) bankrolling civil wars. Tons of ivory has been smuggled in recent years through west Africa in ship-board containers, supposedly carrying another cargo entirely: timber. (There's another commodity often harvested and exported illegally, with devastating environmental effects.)<!--readmore--> <br />
<br />
Another, different battle front: Asia, where elephants aren't hunted to sustain wars, but to protect villagers' crops and livelihoods. As elephant habitats shrink and human populations grow (and tolerance for wildlife declines), this "war" is increasing. A recent <a href="http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/SP217448.htm">Reuters article</a> reports that in Cambodia, the country's 250 or so remaining elephants and its people are locked in conflict. Non-violent means of repelling the elephants' penchant for crops may give way to more lethal ones. In India, 200 to 250 people a year are killed by elephants. One way of avoiding further battles: shifting away from crops elephants like to raid to those they don't. <br />
<br />
But this doesn't always make sense on the ground. Cambodian farmer Siep Nait told Reuters she's thinking of planting sugarcane instead of aubergines: it sells for more money and has more buyers. But, she laments, in a field that fed several elephants (despite not being designed to do so), "I'm scared that the elephants will come and I'll get none." It's a complex calculus: (dead) elephants as war currency; (live) elephants as a liability to peace. Elephants, and people, under intense pressure. More battles, and more booty, ahead.
]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:20:56 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=33
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=33
]]></link>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[
On the Frontlines
]]></title>

<description><![CDATA[

<div class="illowrapper">
<div class="illoliner">
<img src="http://brightergreen.org/images/blog/imagesgorillas dead.jpg" alt="Dead gorillas" height="93" width="124" />
<p>Two Dead in Congo</p>
</div><!-- closes "illoliner" -->
</div><!-- closes "illowrapper" -->
Animals and war may sound like a strange pairing: while we know from <a href="http://www.janegoodall.org">Jane Goodall's research</a> that chimpanzee groups do in fact go to "war" with each other, armed conflict is a distinctly human activity. Yet given our species' reach on the planet, it's not surprising that all manner of animals are affected by our raging battles and their aftermath. Recent news hasn't been good: In the Democratic Republic of Congo, rebels have set up a virtual government inside a national park that's home to more than 200 mountain gorillas. Now, the guerrillas are running tours to see the gorillas. They're also warning that if the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk:80/2/hi/science/nature/7265628.stm">park rangers charged with protecting the gorillas return, the guerrillas will kill them</a>. Earlier this year, several gorillas were killed in the park, most likely by other rebels who are running a successful charcoal syndicate. The gorillas, and the rangers, got in the way of their business. <br />
<br />
This new business poses moral dilemmas on many levels: should tourists pay guerrillas for a service the park rangers are mandated to provide and in doing so, helping support the rebel movement? <!--readmore--> The funds, though, probably will increase the gorillas' chances for survival...even as they help fill the rebels' coffers for more fighting. There's some good news from near the war zone: <a href="http://www.enn.com/wildlife/article/31463">Congo, Rwanda and Uganda have agreed to work together,</a> to protect their respective gorilla populations and their habitat. It's a 10-year plan, costing about &#036;4 million for the first four -- a comparatively tiny amount. Sadly, that's probably not even a patch on the profits from the charcoal trade.<br />
<br />
While Kenya's political crisis drove away most tourists from the country's array of wildlife reserves, the animals did, according to some accounts, enjoy the respite from human activity -- noticeably relaxing. But past conflicts haven't been so kind to neighboring Tanzania's animals. A new report suggests that refugees, many of whom have been stuck in Tanzania for years, are <a href="http://www.traffic.org:80/home/2008/1/22/lack-of-meat-for-refugees-causing-large-scale-poaching.html">hunting and eating wild animals, including chimpanzees</a>, at least in part because the <a href="http://www.wfp.org/english">World Food Program (WFP)</a> only provides vegetarian meals.  "Bush meat" is in demand. The refugees call it "night time spinach" and it's illegal.<br />
<br />
Another war-related dilemma: should the WFP provide meat to refugees? The agency itself notes the higher costs and the fact that meat spoils more easily than beans or starches. Would meat rations reduce the demand for bush meat or perhaps create other, unanticipated markets for it? Could access to meat be considered a human right? (One animal for another.) Doubtful. What I found most astonishing is this: some of the refugees in Tanzania fled Congo (then Zaire) and Burundi decades ago and are still stranded; others left Rwanda during the genocide. More evidence, if any was needed, of war's long, broad reach. Read more <a href="http://gorilla.wildlifedirect.org">here</a> on Congo's mountain gorillas, from the rangers working to protect them (updated just about every day).
]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:12:27 EST</pubDate>
<author>mia@brightergreen.org (Mia MacDonald)</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true"><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=32
]]></guid>
<link><![CDATA[
http://www.brightergreen.org/entry.php?id=32
]]></link>
</item></channel>
</rss>